- Home
- Design
- Services
- UX/UI Design
- Alive Parts
- Alternatives

Top 10 Alive Parts Alternatives & Competitors
Alive Parts is a B2B agency founded in 2009 in the United States, specializing in high-quality app development. Their focus is on creating engaging and innovative applications that resonate with users. They have successfully worked with well-known brands such as Sweetgreen and SeatGeek, emphasizing their commitment to delivering vibrant technology solutions.
Below are 10 agencies, including Proacto, JetSoftPro, Grocode, DotCode, Inflexion Software, Hashed System FZCO, Tech Engine Group, DXMSoft, Bazzite, Pixus Technology & Software Firm:
Top 10 Alternatives to Alive Parts by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Get ProposalsPros:
Cost-effective development solutions availableHighly responsive and adaptable teamQuick turnaround on small projectsCons:
Limited project size may restrict scopeLacks extensive portfolio of large projectsLess established in market since 2019$25 - $49
2 - 9
Founded in 2019
$1,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong team with extensive employeesExpertise in Agile and scalable solutionsActive involvement in all project phasesCons:
Higher minimum project size than competitorsMore expensive hourly rates than budget optionsLarger team may dilute personalized attention$25 - $49
50 - 249
Founded in 2014
$10,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low hourly rates for budget projectsFlexible for small project sizesGood client feedback and collaborationCons:
Limited portfolio due to smaller sizeLower employee count may impact scalabilityLess established reputation in competitive market< $25 / hr
2 - 9
Founded in 2013
$1,000+
Karachi
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Transparent pricing and flexible servicesExperienced team with established reputationGood for mid-range project sizesCons:
Higher hourly rates compared to very cheap optionsLimited team size may reduce capabilitiesLess focus on startup or small business needs$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2018
$5,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong focus on customer satisfactionOffers innovative and custom solutionsEstablished presence within the U.S. marketCons:
Higher project minimums compared to competitionPricing may not fit all budgetsMay be less agile than smaller firms$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2011
$10,000+
Palo Alto
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong focus on AI and digital transformationsCompetitive pricing for unique solutionsGood for high-tech industriesCons:
Limited history since founded in 2020Niche focus may deter broad projectsOnly 2-9 employees may limit workload capacity$150 - $199
2 - 9
Founded in 2020
$5,000+
Dubai
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Custom solutions tailored to business goalsOffers competitive mid-range pricingStrong emphasis on modern technologyCons:
Hourly rate might deter budget-focused firmsMay lack extensive portfolio for large projectsSmaller team may impact response time$50 - $99
2 - 9
Founded in 2010
$10,000+
Los Angeles
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Low pricing structures attract budget clientsDiverse service offerings in tech developmentGood client satisfaction and feedbackCons:
Limited employee count affects project scopeLower market presence compared to larger firmsLacks specialization in high-budget projects$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2018
$5,000+
Lahore
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Established reputation in software solutionsGood for medium-sized project scopesCompetitive pricing in local marketCons:
Undisclosed hourly rates complicate budgetingLimited marketing and business outreachMay be less adaptable to agile projectsUndisclosed
10 - 49
Founded in 2013
$5,000+
Karachi
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
Alive Parts' minimum project size is significantly higher than Proacto and Grocode, making it suitable for clients needing extensive features and support.
Alive Parts offers a premium hourly rate that reflects the high-quality service provided compared to budget agencies like Proacto and DotCode.
Proacto and Grocode present cost-effective hourly rates compared to Alive Parts, appealing to startups on a tight budget.
Geography
Alive Parts is based in the U.S., offering localized expertise to American clients, unlike Proacto and Grocode based overseas.
Alive Parts delivers services in a familiar market for U.S. businesses, while competitors like Grocode operate in lower-cost regions that may present challenges in communication.
Competitors like Inflexion Software and Tech Engine Group also offer U.S. locations, ensuring close collaboration with local clients.
Technologies
Alive Parts excels in app development with a focus on innovative technologies suited for large-scale projects, unlike budget competitors like Grocode.
Proacto provides cost-efficient web development, making them suitable for projects needing basic solutions rather than cutting-edge technologies like Alive Parts offers.
Alive Parts and similar enterprises prioritize high-tech solutions compared to firms like DXMSoft and Tech Engine Group, which may focus on broader service offerings.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions









