- Home
- Development
- Services
- Custom Software
- CAMO
- Alternatives

Top 10 CAMO Alternatives & Competitors
CAMO is a software development company established in 2006, boasting 16 years of experience in delivering quality solutions. With a portfolio of over 400 projects, they cater to both local and international clients. CAMO aims to forge global partnerships to enhance its reach and impact in the software development landscape.
Below are 10 agencies, including Propagent, Xacrosoft, Floating Dots, Codedinn, Integration New Media, Inc. (INM), Vidhema Technologies Pte Ltd, Digital Octane, Webrecks Technologies, Sinergo Data, Designfy:
Top 10 Alternatives to CAMO by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Hire AgencyPros:
Focus on UX which enhances user satisfactionSmall team allows for tailored project approachesCompetitive hourly rate for quality serviceCons:
Higher minimum project size than CAMOLimited portfolio size due to team sizeLess established in the market$25 - $49
2 - 9
Founded in 2012
$10,000+
Budapest
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Organized workflow enhances project deliveryVaried service offerings with skilled developersLocalized experience in Romanian marketCons:
Higher minimum project size than CAMOLess international experiencePotentially less diverse portfolio$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2014
$5,000+
Cluj-Napoca
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Long-term client relationships build trustCompetitive hourly rates among peersEstablished as a long-term partnerCons:
Less experience compared to CAMOHigher minimum project size than CAMOSmaller team limits capacity for larger projects$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2016
$5,000+
Ukraine
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Long industry experience enhances reliabilityAbility to manage larger enterprise projectsEngaging digital solutions tailored to clientsCons:
Higher hourly rates than CAMOMinimum project size less competitiveNot focused on small businesses$100 - $149
10 - 49
Founded in 1989
$1,000+
Montréal
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong presence in Egypt and Saudi ArabiaQuality services with client satisfaction focusCompetitive pricing for custom buildsCons:
Higher minimum project size than some competitorsLess experience than CAMONiche market focus may limit partnerships$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2012
$5,000+
Giza
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
CAMO offers competitive pricing of $50-$99 per hour, while Propagent and Xacrosoft provide lower hourly rates ranging from $25-$49.
The minimum project size for CAMO starts at $5,000+, aligning closely with competitors like Floating Dots and Codedinn, but higher than Propagent and Xacrosoft.
CAMO's extensive experience with 16 years may justify its higher costs compared to newer entrants like Xacrosoft founded in 2018.
Geography
CAMO operates from Estonia, providing a strategic location within Europe, in contrast to competitors like Xacrosoft in Pakistan and Propagent in Hungary.
Floating Dots in Romania and Codedinn in Ukraine offer European-based development, which can be advantageous for clients seeking nearby partners.
With competitors like Digital Octane in the U.S., CAMO is ideal for those who prefer European collaboration but also need international outreach.
Technologies
CAMO's long history in the industry allows for a mature insight into various technologies, potentially leading in quality compared to newer firms like Xacrosoft.
Competitors like Vidhema and Digital Octane show strength in mobile app and web design, providing a wide range of technological capabilities that may be attractive to clients.
Integration New Media (INM) focuses on engaging digital solutions with 20+ years' experience, making them a strong alternative for projects requiring advanced technology.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions