- Home
- Development
- Services
- AR/VR
- Queppelin
- Alternatives

Top 10 Queppelin Alternatives & Competitors
Queppelin is an innovative agency specializing in augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), WebAR, and 3D animation & modeling. Founded in 2010 in India, the company has gained recognition for delivering projects on time, boasting a team of 50-249 employees. Their competitive pricing model, with projects starting at $10,000 and an hourly rate under $25, makes them an attractive option for diverse clients.
Below are 10 agencies, including OrangeLoops, LITSLINK, SOFTUUP, LLC, Goldfish Code, Pro Vision Lab, Pirxon SA - RPA developers, Smooper Labs, WEB-TECH, OVA, ThirstySprout:
Top 10 Alternatives to Queppelin by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Hire Agency- Pros: Affordable project minimums for startup budgets.High transparency in project development processes.Quick turnaround times for smaller projects.- Cons: Higher hourly rates compared to Queppelin.Limited employee base affects project scale.Less experience in augmented reality solutions.- $50 - $99 - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2015 - $5,000+ - Boston - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Strong reputation for professional software delivery.Larger team enhances project capacity.Experience with complex software products.- Cons: Higher project minimums than Queppelin.Hourly rates are significantly higher.Limited focus on AR/VR technologies.- $50 - $99 - 250 - 999 - Founded in 2014 - $25,000+ - Palo Alto - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Competitive hourly rates for quality work.Strong expertise in augmented reality projects.Flexible project sizes accommodate various clients.- Cons: Higher project minimum than Queppelin.Smaller workforce may limit scalability.Less known brand, affecting client trust.- $25 - $49 - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2015 - $25,000+ - Kyiv - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Focus on digital transformation ensuring growth.Good balance of quality and cost-effectiveness.Experienced in multiple software solutions.- Cons: Higher project minimums than Queppelin.Hourly rates exceed Queppelin's pricing.Focus on U.S. clients may limit global reach.- $50 - $99 - 50 - 249 - Founded in 2014 - $25,000+ - New York City - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Competitive minimum project costs.Experienced team offering diverse solutions.Flexible on pricing for smaller projects.- Cons: Smaller team size may limit large projects.May not match AR/VR expertise of Queppelin.Limited recognition compared to larger firms.- $25 - $49 - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2014 - $5,000+ - Kyiv - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Strong flexibility in project requirements.Comparable hourly rate with Queppelin.Experience in automation and RPA solutions.- Cons: Higher minimum project size than Queppelin.Less focus on AR/VR projects.Operational reach may not match Queppelin.- $50 - $99 - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2004 - $10,000+ - Gdańsk - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Very low project minimums allow for flexibility.Cost-effective rates for tighter budgets.Agile team can quickly adapt to changes.- Cons: Very small team limits project size.Less experience in industry-standard technologies.Limited resources for long-term projects.- $25 - $49 - 2 - 9 - Founded in 2019 - $1,000+ - Bengaluru - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Focus on immersive technologies and AI.Innovative solutions in niche sectors.Strong international collaboration.- Cons: Undisclosed hourly rates can create uncertainty.Team size may limit project capabilities.Less expertise in traditional software development.- Undisclosed - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2014 - $1,000+ - Québec - Verified - Focus 
- Pros: Transparent and honest communication throughout projects.Strong focus on remote development expertise.Good in establishing long-term partnerships.- Cons: Highest project minimum costs compared to Queppelin.Hourly rates exceed Queppelin's budget.Limited specialization in AR/VR technologies.- $50 - $99 - 10 - 49 - Founded in 2017 - $50,000+ - Seattle - Verified - Focus 
Comparisons
Cost of services
- Queppelin offers highly competitive rates starting under $25/hour, making them affordable compared to many U.S.-based competitors. 
- Queppelin's minimum project size is $10,000, lower than some competitors who have higher minimums like LITSLINK ($25,000+). 
- Their pricing model allows for greater flexibility for clients on tighter budgets, especially compared to agencies like Goldfish Code. 
Geography
- Queppelins's base in India allows them to compete effectively on cost with agencies located in higher-cost countries like the U.S. 
- While competitors like OrangeLoops and LITSLINK are U.S.-based and offer high-quality services, Queppelin provides an international perspective with their Indian heritage. 
- Being in India, Queppelin can leverage a large talent pool and cost advantages, unlike smaller U.S. based agencies. 
Technologies
- Queppelin's expertise in AR and VR technology stands out in comparison to other agencies, offering more advanced capabilities in these fields. 
- While competitors like SOFTUUP focus on AR, Queppelin covers a broader range of advanced technologies including AI and 3D modeling. 
- Queppelin's focus on innovative solutions like WebAR makes them a strong player against agencies that primarily concentrate on traditional web development. 
Recommendations
- Launching on a limited budget
- Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
- Looking for long-term digital partnership
- Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
- Solving business problems with custom solutions







