Top 10 Fluid Attacks Alternatives & Competitors
Fluid Attacks is an experienced cybersecurity firm founded in 2001 that delivers comprehensive software hacking services aimed at uncovering security flaws in applications. With a user-friendly approach, they strive to align their services with the unique business needs of their clients, thereby enhancing their value proposition. They have a solid team of 50-249 employees and cater to project sizes starting from $10,000.
Below are 10 agencies, including UnderDefense, Framework Security, Pentest7, REDTEAM.PL, Active audit agency, LLC, IARM Information Security, SecurityX, edgescan, Odix, LARES:
Top 10 Alternatives to Fluid Attacks by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Get ProposalsPros:
High level of customer satisfaction reportedFocused on data breach protectionSmall team ensures personalized serviceCons:
Small employee count limits project capacityHigher project minimum compared to Fluid AttacksNewer company with less experience$150 - $199
2 - 9
Founded in 2019
$5,000+
Marina del Rey
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Lower hourly rate offers cost advantageFast response and turnaround timesSmall team provides personalized attentionCons:
Less experience compared to Fluid AttacksLimited service offerings compared to larger firmsNewer company with less market penetration$25 - $49
2 - 9
Founded in 2021
$5,000+
Sheridan
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low hourly rate advantageous for clientsWide range of services availableEstablished operations since 2015Cons:
Less experience than Fluid AttacksQuality assurance may vary with low costPotentially slower response times due to size< $25 / hr
50 - 249
Founded in 2015
$5,000+
Chennai
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Competitive pricing with lower hourly rateFocused on cloud and web application securityPresence in Canada expands geographic reachCons:
Newer company may lack depth of experienceSmaller employee count limits projectsLimited service range for comprehensive security$25 - $49
50 - 249
Founded in 2020
$1,000+
Toronto
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong reputation with full stack vulnerability serviceEstablished agency since 2011High client satisfaction with resultsCons:
Higher hourly rate than Fluid AttacksLimited employee count reducing project outputLess geographic diversity compared to Fluid Attacks$100 - $149
10 - 49
Founded in 2011
$5,000+
Dublin
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Innovative technology in email protectionEstablished in 2012 with growing customer baseFocus on advanced anti-malware solutionsCons:
Not focused on complete security servicesLimited employee size restricts large projectsHigher minimum project size relative to othersUndisclosed
10 - 49
Founded in 2012
$1,000+
Israel
Verified
Focus
Pros:
In-depth knowledge in security consultingEstablished in the United States since 2007Focus on comprehensive security measuresCons:
Higher minimum project size than Fluid AttacksLess client feedback availableUndisclosed rates could deter potential clientsUndisclosed
10 - 49
Founded in 2007
$1,000+
Denver
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
UnderDefense offers a lower minimum project size of $5,000, making it accessible for startups.
Pentest7 has the most competitive hourly rate starting at $25, attracting cost-sensitive clients.
IARM Information Security has an hourly rate of less than $25, making it highly affordable for basic cybersecurity needs.
Geography
REDTEAM.PL provides services from Poland, offering a European perspective on cybersecurity.
IARM Information Security is based in India, providing a diverse geographical option.
SecurityX is based in Canada, offering a North American approach to cybersecurity that may appeal to those looking for proximity.
Technologies
Framework Security specializes in niche cybersecurity services that might suit specific client needs.
Odix develops advanced anti-malware technology which may cater to clients looking for specialized technology solutions.
edgescan provides a full-stack vulnerability management system which is essential for businesses seeking robust cybersecurity mechanisms.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions









