- Home
- Design
- Services
- UX/UI Design
- Matcha Design Labs
- Alternatives
Top 10 Matcha Design Labs Alternatives & Competitors
Matcha Design Labs is a U.S.-based design agency founded in 2017 that specializes in enhancing user experience through impactful designs. The agency is recognized for delivering high-quality creative solutions aimed at increasing user delight and positively affecting clients' bottom lines. With a small team of 2-9 employees, they attract clients seeking premium services starting from $25,000, and charge an hourly rate between $200 and $299.
Below are 10 agencies, including Cerdonis Technologies LLC, Caviarsoft, Brave UX, Qubstudio, Dreamten, Eleken, LinkUp Studio, Adam Fard UX Studio, Super User Studio, The Gradient:
Top 10 Alternatives to Matcha Design Labs by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Get Proposals
Pros:
Very low hourly rate attracts startupsWide range of services including VRStrong presence in the US marketCons:
Lower project minimums might compromise qualitySmaller team may lead to fewer resourcesLess focus on high-end design services$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2015
$10,000+
Westmont
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Affordable project minimums compared to MatchaLower hourly rate offers cost savingsEstablished since 2013 with experienceCons:
Fewer employee resources than MatchaNot focused on UX design exclusivelyBased in Poland, could have timezone issues$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2013
$10,000+
Warszawa
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Same hourly rate range as MatchaStrong reputation for project managementFocus on mobile and web aligns with MatchaCons:
Higher project minimums limit client typeEmployees outnumber Matcha's by a large marginMore expensive compared to cheaper competitors$200 - $299
10 - 49
Founded in 2014
$50,000+
Washington, D.C.
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Low project minimums that entice startupsWide array of design services offeredEstablished in 2006, strong experienceCons:
Lower hourly rates than MatchaLocated in Ukraine, could affect collaborationFocus on branding might not fit all projects$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2006
$10,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Comparable project minimums with MatchaStrong reputation for understanding business needsSimilar employee size allows for personalized serviceCons:
Hourly rate slightly lower than MatchaLess established than MatchaNot primarily focused on user experience$100 - $149
2 - 9
Founded in 2014
$25,000+
Raleigh
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low project minimums which is attractiveAffordable hourly rates lead to cost savingsStrong focus on UI/UX for SaaS productsCons:
Lower quality may be associated with lower costLess presence in the US market than MatchaLarger teams might provide more resources$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2014
$5,000+
Kyiv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low project minimums attract many clientsLarge number of employees provides flexibilityStrong presence in Ukraine and experienceCons:
Hourly rates lower than Matcha dilutes perceived valueNot focused specifically on high-quality designLarger scale might affect personal attention$25 - $49
50 - 249
Founded in 2013
$10,000+
Lviv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Utilizes a similar project minimum to MatchaSmaller team allows for personal touchCompetitive hourly rate for the qualityCons:
Lower overall employee resources than MatchaLimited long-term reputation compared to MatchaNot as diverse in service offerings$50 - $99
2 - 9
Founded in 2016
$10,000+
San Francisco
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Focused on detail and rigorous methodologySimilar project minimums to Matcha'sSpecializes in UX and product design which matchesCons:
Higher hourly rates may deter budget clientsLocated in the UK may affect collaborationPotentially fewer resources compared to larger firms$150 - $199
2 - 9
Founded in 2008
$25,000+
London
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very good client feedback reflects qualityLow project minimum may attract startupsSimilar hourly rate makes it competitiveCons:
Lower focus on UX design compared to MatchaLess established brand than MatchaLarger employee base might hinder personal touch$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2015
$10,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
Cerdonis Technologies has a lower minimum project size of $10,000+, making it more accessible for smaller budgets.
Eleken and LinkUp Studio offer significantly lower hourly rates (starting from $25), reducing client costs for projects.
Caviarsoft's hourly rate starts at $50, which is more budget-friendly compared to Matcha's pricing.
Brave UX and Super User Studio offer similar high-end services starting at $50,000, which may be ideal for larger projects.
Geography
Cerdonis Technologies and Brave UX are based in the U.S., making collaboration easier with local clients.
Caviarsoft and Eleken are based in Poland and Ukraine, providing European service options at lower rates.
Matcha Design Labs caters exclusively to the U.S. market, which may appeal to companies seeking local knowledge.
LinkUp Studio and Qubstudio in Ukraine offer unique advantages in terms of cost for U.S. companies needing offshore support.
Technologies
Cerdonis Technologies specializes in mobile, web, AR, and VR, which may appeal to diverse tech needs.
Matcha Design Labs has a focus on user experience, making them suitable for projects emphasizing design.
Eleken has a niche in UI/UX for SaaS products, fitting needs for software companies.
Super User Studio offers detailed UX research methodologies, beneficial for data-driven projects.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions