- Home
- Development
- Services
- Blockchain
- Shrine
- Alternatives

Top 10 Shrine Alternatives & Competitors
Shrine is a B2B agency established in 2017 based in the United States, known for its focus on project rescue efforts. The company claims to have expertise in delivering complex projects, although user opinions indicate some dissatisfaction regarding project outcomes. With a minimum project size of $5,000 and an hourly rate ranging from $150 to $199, Shrine operates with a sizable workforce of over 10,000 employees.
Below are 10 agencies, including Binary Mango, Heveloon ltd, EthWorks, Merehead, Sunrise Technologies, Espeo Blockchain, Block360, Ajath, Oodles Blockchain, Blockchain Australia™:
Top 10 Alternatives to Shrine by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Hire AgencyPros:
Affordable hourly rates compared to ShrineSmall team allow for personalized serviceStrong reputation on multiple platformsCons:
Higher minimum project size than ShrineLimited employee size restricts capacityLocated in UK, may have timezone issues$100 - $149
2 - 9
Founded in 2016
$10,000+
London
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Competitive pricing makes them accessiblePositive user feedback on project resultsVersatile services including blockchainCons:
Relatively new agency compared to ShrineMinimum project size matches Shrine'sCould lack capacity for larger projects$100 - $149
10 - 49
Founded in 2018
$5,000+
London
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low hourly rates good for startupsWell-rounded design services offeredEstablished in fintech and logistics fieldsCons:
Higher minimum project size than ShrineLimited experience in blockchain compared to ShrineLocated in Ukraine may affect collaboration$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2015
$10,000+
Kyiv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low hourly rates offer great valueEstablished agency with good track recordEffective communication praised by usersCons:
Higher minimum project size than ShrineLimited employee capacity may affect supportLocated in Australia may cause delays$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2016
$5,000+
Sydney
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Extensive team size for larger projectsExperienced in blockchain consultingHigh satisfaction among clientsCons:
Higher minimum projects size compared to ShrineHourly rates near Shrine’s max rangeLocated in Poland may affect collaboration$50 - $99
50 - 249
Founded in 2008
$10,000+
Poznań
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Low minimum project size makes them accessibleCosts significantly lower than ShrineLocated in US for better timezone alignmentCons:
Limited team size might affect capabilitiesLower hourly rates might indicate qualityLess specialization in niche markets$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2017
$1,000+
Mountain View
Verified
Focus
Pros:
High prestige in blockchain ecosystemWorks on large, enterprise-level projectsEstablished and reputable agencyCons:
Highest minimum project size of competitorsHigh hourly rates align with premium pricingLimited resources due to small team size$150 - $199
2 - 9
Founded in 2017
$100,000+
Melbourne
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
Binary Mango offers lower hourly rates ($100-$149) compared to Shrine's ($150-$199).
Heveloon ltd has comparable minimum project size ($5,000+) yet offers lower hourly rates.
Merehead has a much lower hourly rate range ($25-$49) and the same minimum project size.
Geography
Binary Mango serves the United Kingdom, providing access to the European market.
Heveloon ltd also operates in the UK, which may offer local insights to UK-based clients.
Block360 and Shrine are based in the U.S., providing options for domestic clients.
Technologies
EthWorks specializes in blockchain technology, which may be appealing for clients needing tech expertise.
Oodles Blockchain has extensive experience in blockchain which can be advantageous for tech-driven projects.
Merehead specializes in blockchain applications that may suit fintech and logistics sectors.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions