Top 10 The Gnar Company Alternatives & Competitors

The Gnar Company accelerates development for businesses by delivering custom software solutions. Founded in 2015, they emphasize collaboration and client satisfaction. They cater to projects starting at $10,000 with a dedicated team of 10-49 employees based in the United States.

Below are 10 agencies, including WorkingMouse, Squash Apps Private Limited, Phuse, MPS DEVELOPMENT, Street 17, Blue Horizon Infotech, 90 Pixel, Webscope.io, Acil Technologies Pvt Ltd, Malvas:

Top 10 Alternatives to The Gnar Company by 7BE

Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper

Get Proposals

This is how 7BE can help you:

Easily get vetted proposals from trusted IT agencies
Own your entire hiring and project sourcing journey
Discover competitive offers tailored to your needs

  • WorkingMouse

    Onshore development with a proven process

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Proven development process with transparency
    Strong team engagement in projects
    Focus on onshore development for quality

    Cons:

    Higher minimum project size compared to Gnar
    Undisclosed hourly rates may create uncertainty
    Limited geographical outreach in Australia

    Undisclosed

    50 - 249

    Founded in 2014

    $25,000+

    Milton

    Verified

    Focus

    85% Custom Software

    85%85% Custom Software

    5%5% UX/UI Design

    5%5% Web Design

    5%5% Enterprise App Modernization

  • Squash Apps Private Limited

    Build Your Next Big Product With Us!

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Lower hourly rates for budget-conscious clients
    Agile approach benefits startups and entrepreneurs
    Strong track record of successful projects

    Cons:

    Intercontinental collaboration may have challenges
    Quality perception can vary due to location
    Smaller team size may affect scalability

    $25 - $49

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2015

    $10,000+

    Coimbatore

    Verified

    Focus

    80% Custom Software

    80%80% Custom Software

    10%10% Enterprise App Modernization

    5%5% UX/UI Design

    5%5% Web Design

  • Phuse

    We craft solutions for web and mobile

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Strong history with reliable deliverables
    Excellent communication and accountability
    Comparably low rates for quality services

    Cons:

    Higher minimum project size than Gnar
    Limited to Canadian timezone availability
    May lack some innovative technology stack

    $100 - $149

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2009

    $25,000+

    Toronto

    Verified

    Focus

    50% Custom Software

    50%50% Custom Software

    20%20% UX/UI Design

    20%20% Web Design

    5%5% Enterprise App Modernization

    5%5% Logo

  • MPS DEVELOPMENT

    Web and cross-platform mobile development

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Very low minimum project size appealing for startups
    Lower hourly rates compared to competitors
    Focused expertise in web and mobile development

    Cons:

    Perceived lower quality due to location
    Limited availability of employees
    Scalability issues with small team size

    $25 - $49

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2008

    $5,000+

    Kyiv

    Verified

    Focus

    80% Custom Software

    80%80% Custom Software

    10%10% Enterprise App Modernization

    5%5% UX/UI Design

    5%5% Web Design

  • Street 17

    We build complex websites and web-tech solutions.

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Very low minimum project size to accommodate startups
    Highly creative design capabilities
    Small team allows for agile responses

    Cons:

    Limited workforce may bottleneck projects
    Time zone differences with U.S. clients
    Limited experience in complex projects

    $25 - $49

    2 - 9

    Founded in 2019

    $1,000+

    Tallinn

    Verified

    Focus

    60% Custom Software

    60%60% Custom Software

    20%20% Enterprise App Modernization

    10%10% UX/UI Design

    10%10% Web Design

  • Blue Horizon Infotech

    Solutions That Signify Accelerated Growth

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Extremely low hourly rates for budget projects
    Flexible with project scope and client demands
    Good client satisfaction with problem-solving

    Cons:

    Limited resources could affect quality
    Uncertain expertise in technology specifics
    May lack in advanced development methodologies

    < $25 / hr

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2011

    $1,000+

    Ernakulam

    Verified

    Focus

    35% Custom Software

    35%35% Custom Software

    20%20% Enterprise App Modernization

    10%10% UX/UI Design

    10%10% Web Design

    10%10% eCommerce

    5%5% Search Engine Optimization

    5%5% Application Testing

    5%5% Application Management & Support

  • 90 Pixel

    We turn ideas into superb digital experiences.

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Engagement in projects as part of development team
    Strong focus on agile methodologies
    Balanced pricing for service quality

    Cons:

    Not as widely recognized in North America
    Possible language barriers with Turkish team
    Smaller team might limit project capacity

    $25 - $49

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2016

    $5,000+

    Izmir

    Verified

    Focus

    55% Custom Software

    55%55% Custom Software

    20%20% Enterprise App Modernization

    15%15% UX/UI Design

    10%10% Web Design

  • Webscope.io

    Software solutions your customers will love.

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Specializes in tailored software solutions
    Diverse portfolio in user-friendly software
    Mid-range hourly rates provide balance

    Cons:

    Higher prices may deter budget clients
    Geographic limitations affecting collaboration
    Less experience compared to older competitors

    $50 - $99

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2015

    $5,000+

    Brno

    Verified

    Focus

    60% Custom Software

    60%60% Custom Software

    20%20% Enterprise App Modernization

    10%10% UX/UI Design

    10%10% Web Design

  • Acil Technologies Pvt Ltd

    Digital Marketing Agency

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Very low minimum project size for startups
    Broad service range across 80+ countries
    Competitive pricing due to low rates

    Cons:

    Quality perception may vary widely
    Limited capabilities in custom solutions
    Focus on marketing may overshadow tech capabilities

    < $25 / hr

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2012

    $1,000+

    Gurugram

    Verified

    Focus

    25% Web Design

    25%25% Web Design

    25%25% eCommerce

    15%15% Custom Software

    15%15% UX/UI Design

    5%5% Digital Strategy

    5%5% Internet of Things

    5%5% Enterprise App Modernization

    5%5% Mobile & App Marketing

  • Malvas

    IT team on demand

    View Portfolio

    Pros:

    Access to a large talent pool for scalability
    Flexible IT solutions tailored to needs
    Competitive pricing for quality expertise

    Cons:

    Geographical distance may complicate communication
    Less established reputation may raise concerns
    Newer company with less client history

    $25 - $49

    10 - 49

    Founded in 2019

    $1,000+

    Kyiv

    Verified

    Focus

    45% Custom Software

    45%45% Custom Software

    5%5% UX/UI Design

    5%5% BI & Big Data Consulting & SI

    5%5% Web Design

    5%5% IT Staff Augmentation

    5%5% IT Managed Services

    5%5% Artificial Intelligence

    5%5% Digital Strategy

    5%5% eCommerce

    5%5% Branding

    5%5% Enterprise App Modernization

    5%5% Business Consulting

Comparisons

Cost of services

  • Gnar offers competitive hourly rates between $100 - $149, which is attractive given its service quality.

  • Squash Apps has a significantly lower hourly rate ($25 - $49) making it cost-effective for smaller budgets.

  • WorkingMouse requires a higher minimum project size of $25,000+, which may not suit all clients.

Geography

  • Gnar operates in the U.S., providing localized services ideal for American businesses.

  • Phuse serves the Canadian market, which is culturally and economically similar to the U.S., good for North American clients.

  • Squash Apps is based in India, offering cost advantages but potential language and time zone barriers for U.S. clients.

Technologies

  • Gnar leverages modern technology stacks common in the U.S. market, ensuring relevance and effectiveness.

  • Street 17 specializes in complex web-tech solutions, ideal for advanced projects requiring high expertise.

  • Webscope.io focuses on user experience, crafting solutions that prioritize customer satisfaction.

Recommendations

  • Launching on a limited budget

    Choose Squash Apps for their competitive rates starting at $25/hr and flexibility in project minimums for cost-effective solutions.

  • Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies

    The Gnar Company is an excellent choice for U.S. collaboration, offering tailored services and local expertise.

  • Looking for long-term digital partnership

    Phuse is well-suited for long-term engagements due to their reliable service and commitment to meeting client expectations.

  • Requiring niche B2B industry expertise

    Consider WorkingMouse if you're looking for an agency with a proven process tailored to specific business needs in Australia.

  • Solving business problems with custom solutions

    Choose MPS Development for custom web and mobile solutions without breaking the bank.

Start Getting Real Proposals and See The Difference

Get Proposals