- Home
- Design
- Services
- UX/UI Design
- Super User Studio
- Alternatives
Top 10 Super User Studio Alternatives & Competitors
Super User Studio is a UK-based UX and product design agency that specializes in enterprise and SaaS solutions. Founded in 2008, they are known for their attention to detail and a rigorous methodology in UX design. With a minimum project size of $25,000 and an hourly rate ranging from $150 to $199, they maintain a small team of 2 to 9 employees. Their commitment to quality and user-centered design makes them a strong choice for businesses looking for tailored UX solutions.
Below are 10 agencies, including Caviarsoft, Cerdonis Technologies LLC, Brave UX, Qubstudio, Dreamten, Eleken, LinkUp Studio, Adam Fard UX Studio, The Gradient, SHERPA:
Top 10 Alternatives to Super User Studio by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Hire Agency
Pros:
Affordable rates compared to Super User StudioLarger team for more project capacityUser-centered design approach emphasizes qualityCons:
Lower hourly rates may affect perceived qualityFewer years of experience than competitorsLimited specialization in UX design$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2013
$10,000+
Warszawa
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Significantly lower hourly and project ratesDiverse service offerings including AR/VRYoung but growing company with fresh ideasCons:
Less focus on UX-specific nichesLess experienced than Super User StudioMay lack in rigorous methodologies$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2015
$10,000+
Westmont
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Higher design quality reflects their premium pricingStrong reputation for project managementFocus on large, enterprise-level projectsCons:
Much higher costs than Super User StudioMinimum project size is significantly moreLimited to larger clients, less flexibility$200 - $299
10 - 49
Founded in 2014
$50,000+
Washington, D.C.
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Competitive pricing within the marketEstablished presence since 2006Flexible project scope managementCons:
May not match Super User Studio in UX specializationPotentially faster turnaround but less detailLess client engagement feedback$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2006
$10,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Comparable project sizes make them competitivePositive partner feedback indicates reliabilityBased in the US, similar market familiarityCons:
Hourly rate slightly lower but quality variesLess extensive service offerings than Super User StudioSame employee range indicating similar capacity$100 - $149
2 - 9
Founded in 2014
$25,000+
Raleigh
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Extremely affordable rates compared to Super User StudioLower minimum project cost can attract startupsStrong user-friendly interface focusCons:
Less experienced team may impact outcomesLimited project size capabilitiesPotential budget constraints can affect quality$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2014
$5,000+
Kyiv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Very low project costs attract small businessesLarge team may support more projectsEngagement model may suit diverse clientsCons:
Lowest design specialization focusQuality may vary with large team dynamicsLess personalized service due to size$25 - $49
50 - 249
Founded in 2013
$10,000+
Lviv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Competitive pricing for quality design servicesDedicated team for startups can accelerate growthPositive reviews indicate a solid work ethicCons:
Smaller team size may limit project capacityLimited experience compared to Super User StudioMay lack advanced tools compared to others$50 - $99
2 - 9
Founded in 2016
$10,000+
San Francisco
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Flexible project scope and competitive pricingStrong client engagement and cultureMultinational team offering diverse perspectivesCons:
Quality may fluctuate based on team membersSimilar hourly rates mean competition for qualityLimited UX specialization compared to Super User Studio$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2015
$10,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong passion and sincerity in design workPrice range is competitive with Super User StudioUX/UI specialization adds valueCons:
Limited scalability due to smaller teamCosts may rise with advanced requestsCompetitive landscape might overshadow uniqueness$100 - $149
10 - 49
Founded in 2013
$10,000+
London
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
Caviarsoft offers lower project minimums starting at $10,000, providing cost-effective options for clients.
Cerdonis Technologies LLC has the lowest hourly rate among competitors, starting at $25, making them budget-friendly.
Eleken has a minimum project size of $5,000, ideal for clients with very limited budgets.
LinkUp Studio offers competitive hourly rates starting from $25, making them accessible for various projects.
Dreamten, although priced higher than Super User Studio, remains competitive with project minimums starting at $25,000.
Geography
Caviarsoft operates out of Poland, providing services at a lower cost compared to UK-based agencies.
Cerdonis Technologies LLC in the USA is a strong option for clients looking to work within the same time zone.
Qubstudio, based in Ukraine, offers high-quality services while being geographically closer to clients in Europe.
LinkUp Studio, also in Ukraine, can be a great alternative for European clients looking for competitive pricing.
SHERPA, another agency in the UK, provides local expertise and collaboration opportunities.
Technologies
Cerdonis Technologies specializes in emerging technologies like Augmented and Virtual Reality, appealing to tech-savvy clients.
Brave UX possesses strong design capabilities coupled with effective project management, making them suitable for complex technology collaboration.
Eleken focuses specifically on UI/UX design for SaaS products, perfect for startups developing software solutions.
The Gradient emphasizes mobile and SaaS product design, which aligns with modern digital trends and needs.
Caviarsoft prides itself on rigorous engineering standards, ensuring technical robustness in web and mobile apps.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions