- Home
- Development
- Services
- Meta
- Coma Web Development
- Alternatives

Top 10 Coma Web Development Alternatives & Competitors
Coma Web Development is a Latvia-based agency specializing in WordPress website design and development. Founded in 2012, the company offers tailored web solutions with an emphasis on timely delivery. Coma Web Development caters to various business needs, providing a solid foundation for clients looking to enhance their online presence.
Below are 10 agencies, including Integral Vision, Highrise Digital, FRESHCODE, SE7ENSKY frontend studio, Apiqu, SoftFormance, ihousedesign, Front10, LLC, Zade Agency, Glivera-team:
Top 10 Alternatives to Coma Web Development by 7BE
Hire the Right Agency — Smarter, Faster, Cheaper
Hire AgencyPros:
In-depth WordPress knowledgeGood user feedback on approachFocus on best practices in developmentCons:
Small team may be overwhelmedUndisclosed hourly rates can hinder comparisonsLimited service offerings compared to larger teamsUndisclosed
2 - 9
Founded in 2016
$10,000+
United Kingdom
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Large team allows project scalabilityProven track record in web solutionsStrong presence in the Ukrainian marketCons:
Higher project size minimums may limit clientsComplex organizational structure could lead to delaysLess personalized service due to team size$25 - $49
50 - 249
Founded in 2014
$25,000+
Zaporizhzhia
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Focus on SaaS application developmentPositive feedback on communicationModerate pricing compared to competitorsCons:
Higher min project size than averageFocus on specific services may limit flexibilityLess known brand in broader markets$50 - $99
10 - 49
Founded in 2011
$25,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Specializes in modern web technologiesResponsive and reasonable client supportEstablished in the US marketCons:
Higher min project size compared to ComaMay lack extensive WordPress capabilitiesDependence on specific technology (ReactJS)$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2018
$10,000+
Coral Gables
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Impressive speed and flexibilityDiverse service offerings in developmentStrong user feedback on performanceCons:
Relatively new company in the industryHigher min project size might limit small clientsPotential scaling issues due to company size$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2020
$5,000+
L'viv
Verified
Focus
Pros:
Strong partnership approach with agenciesClear strengths in frontend servicesEffective communication highlighted by usersCons:
Limited service offerings may deter some clientsHigher project size minimum compared to ComaUS market dominance poses some disadvantages$25 - $49
10 - 49
Founded in 2012
$1,000+
Kharkiv
Verified
Focus
Comparisons
Cost of services
Coma's hourly rate ($25-$49) is competitive, similar to SE7ENSKY and Front10, appealing for budget-conscious projects.
Coma requires a minimum project size of $1,000, matching SE7ENSKY and other competitive agencies without a high entry barrier.
Coma provides good value for WordPress development compared to APIQU, which has a higher hourly rate of $100-$149.
Geography
Coma is located in Latvia, serving clients in the European market, akin to other Eastern European competitors like Zade Agency and SE7ENSKY.
Latvia's strategic position in Europe allows Coma to easily collaborate with Western businesses.
For local European projects, Coma provides a convenience that agencies from North America or distant locations don't offer.
Technologies
Coma specializes in WordPress, similar to Highrise Digital, making it ideal for businesses primarily seeking WordPress solutions.
Their experience aligns well for UK and US-based clients looking for similar tech stacks as competitors like Highrise and SE7ENSKY.
Coma's focus on web development involves modern web technologies, comparable to Zade and Front10.
Recommendations
Launching on a limited budget
Collaborating with U.S.-based agencies
Looking for long-term digital partnership
Requiring niche B2B industry expertise
Solving business problems with custom solutions