Alternativen & Wettbewerber

Top 10 Coma Web Development Alternativen

Coma Web Development is a Latvia-based agency specializing in WordPress website design and development. Founded in 2012, the company offers tailored web solutions with an emphasis on timely delivery. Coma Web Development caters to various business needs, providing a solid foundation for clients looking to enhance their online presence.

Nachfolgend finden Sie 10 Agenturen, darunter Integral Vision, Highrise Digital, FRESHCODE, SE7ENSKY frontend studio, Apiqu, SoftFormance, ihousedesign, Front10, LLC, Zade Agency, Glivera-team:

Bereitgestellt von 7BE

Top 10 Alternativen zu Coma Web Development

Finden Sie die passende Agentur — smarter, schneller, günstiger.

Angebote erhalten

Dauert 5 Minuten · 100 % kostenlos

So kann 7BE Ihnen helfen

  • Erhalten Sie mühelos verlässliche Angebote von vertrauenswürdigen IT-Agenturen
  • Behalten Sie die Kontrolle über Ihren gesamten Auswahl- und Beauftragungsprozess
  • Entdecken Sie wettbewerbsfähige Angebote, die auf Ihre Anforderungen zugeschnitten sind
  • #01Integral Vision

    We build trust.

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Reputation for building trust with clients
    • Good feedback on agile methodologies
    • Experience spanning multiple sectors

    Nachteile

    • Higher hourly rates may limit clients
    • Focused mainly in Hungary
    • Min project size limits small businesses

    €40 - €85

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2009

    €8.500+

    Budapest

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #02Highrise Digital

    Expert, reliable WordPress development

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • In-depth WordPress knowledge
    • Good user feedback on approach
    • Focus on best practices in development

    Nachteile

    • Small team may be overwhelmed
    • Undisclosed hourly rates can hinder comparisons
    • Limited service offerings compared to larger teams

    Keine Angabe

    2 - 9

    Gegründet 2016

    €8.500+

    United Kingdom

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #03FRESHCODE

    Web solutions for your business

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Large team allows project scalability
    • Proven track record in web solutions
    • Strong presence in the Ukrainian market

    Nachteile

    • Higher project size minimums may limit clients
    • Complex organizational structure could lead to delays
    • Less personalized service due to team size

    €20 - €40

    50 - 249

    Gegründet 2014

    €21.000+

    Zaporizhzhia

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #04SE7ENSKY frontend studio

    We are frontend

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Strong experience with frontend development
    • Positive user feedback on reliability
    • Competitive pricing for quality service

    Nachteile

    • Limited services beyond frontend
    • No available hourly rate details
    • Less presence in Western markets

    €20 - €40

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2010

    €1.000+

    Kiev

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #05Apiqu

    Your Sitecore Experts

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Expertise in Sitecore development
    • Strong reputation among few clients
    • Offers high-quality, specialized services

    Nachteile

    • High hourly rate may deter clients
    • Min project size is higher than competitors
    • Limited team size for larger projects

    €85 - €125

    10 - 49

    Nicht angegeben

    €1.000+

    Vaughan

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #06SoftFormance

    We plan, develop and launch SaaS apps

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Focus on SaaS application development
    • Positive feedback on communication
    • Moderate pricing compared to competitors

    Nachteile

    • Higher min project size than average
    • Focus on specific services may limit flexibility
    • Less known brand in broader markets

    €40 - €85

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2011

    €21.000+

    L'viv

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #07ihousedesign

    web-design, web-development, digital marketing

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Creative web design and marketing services
    • Highly responsive team communication
    • Small team allows personalized service

    Nachteile

    • Limited capacity may hinder large projects
    • Undisclosed pricing transparency
    • Less established in the market

    Keine Angabe

    2 - 9

    Gegründet 2003

    €1.000+

    Toronto

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #08Front10, LLC

    We build fantastic Front-ends using ReactJS.

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Specializes in modern web technologies
    • Responsive and reasonable client support
    • Established in the US market

    Nachteile

    • Higher min project size compared to Coma
    • May lack extensive WordPress capabilities
    • Dependence on specific technology (ReactJS)

    €20 - €40

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2018

    €8.500+

    Coral Gables

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #09Zade Agency

    Web & Mobile App Development

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Impressive speed and flexibility
    • Diverse service offerings in development
    • Strong user feedback on performance

    Nachteile

    • Relatively new company in the industry
    • Higher min project size might limit small clients
    • Potential scaling issues due to company size

    €20 - €40

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2020

    €4.000+

    L'viv

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

  • #10Glivera-team

    front-end service for agencies and teams

    Portfolio ansehen

    Vorteile

    • Strong partnership approach with agencies
    • Clear strengths in frontend services
    • Effective communication highlighted by users

    Nachteile

    • Limited service offerings may deter some clients
    • Higher project size minimum compared to Coma
    • US market dominance poses some disadvantages

    €20 - €40

    10 - 49

    Gegründet 2012

    €1.000+

    Kharkiv

    Verifiziert

    Schwerpunkt

    50% Meta

    50%50% Meta

    10%10% Customer-Relationship-Management

    10%10% Enterprise-Ressourcenplanung

    10%10% Warehouse-Management-Systeme

    10%10% Maps

    10%10% Messenger

Direkter Vergleich

Vergleiche

Servicekosten

  • Coma's hourly rate ($25-$49) is competitive, similar to SE7ENSKY and Front10, appealing for budget-conscious projects.
  • Coma requires a minimum project size of $1,000, matching SE7ENSKY and other competitive agencies without a high entry barrier.
  • Coma provides good value for WordPress development compared to APIQU, which has a higher hourly rate of $100-$149.

Geografie

  • Coma is located in Latvia, serving clients in the European market, akin to other Eastern European competitors like Zade Agency and SE7ENSKY.
  • Latvia's strategic position in Europe allows Coma to easily collaborate with Western businesses.
  • For local European projects, Coma provides a convenience that agencies from North America or distant locations don't offer.

Technologien

  • Coma specializes in WordPress, similar to Highrise Digital, making it ideal for businesses primarily seeking WordPress solutions.
  • Their experience aligns well for UK and US-based clients looking for similar tech stacks as competitors like Highrise and SE7ENSKY.
  • Coma's focus on web development involves modern web technologies, comparable to Zade and Front10.
Orientierung

Empfehlungen

Wählen Sie mit diesen kurzen Hinweisen die passende Agentur für Ihre Anforderungen.

  • Coma Web Development and SE7ENSKY both offer competitive rates starting at $25, making them ideal for budget-sensitive projects.
  • Consider Front10, LLC for front-end needs as they're based in the U.S. and have a strong reputation for collaboration.
  • SoftFormance provides a solid foundation for long-term partnerships, while also ensuring quality web and SaaS solutions.
  • Apiqu specializes in Sitecore and stands out for its niche B2B expertise, catering to specific industry needs.
  • Coma Web Development and Highrise Digital both focus on practical web solutions, ideal for addressing custom business needs.
Bereit, wenn Sie es sind

Erhalten Sie echte Angebote und sehen Sie den Unterschied

Erzählen Sie uns von Ihrem Projekt und wir vermitteln Ihnen zuverlässige Agenturen.

Angebote erhalten

Dauert 5 Min. 100 % kostenlos